Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 24.06.2025 15:40

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Scientists Unveil a Method to Give Every Human the Ability to See in the Dark - The Daily Galaxy
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What does it mean when someone says "I'm feeling frisky"?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
What is the most offensive thing someone has ever asked you?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
A Forgotten Cancer Is Surging in Young People, And Experts Are Puzzled - ScienceAlert
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What’s next?
Russia can stop this any time.
Flying Now Puts You At Risk Of Measles Exposure, CDC Says - Jalopnik
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Pokémon Go Jangmo-o Community Day guide - Polygon
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
California doctor to plead guilty to supplying Matthew Perry with ketamine - BBC